APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five9 has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 0.21%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Five9's return on equity of -0.9%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $37.34 which suggests that it could grow by 41.7%. Given that Five9 has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Five9 is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.733%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $279.7M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Five9's net income of $576K. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.79x versus 1.92x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 36.86%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.79x versus 12.12x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 17.96%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $101.12 which suggests that it could grow by 7.62%. Given that Pegasystems has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Pegasystems is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.811%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 45.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.79x versus 5.32x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of -0.69%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Appian has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $35.21 which suggests that it could grow by 39.57%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.791%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $216.3M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Rapid7's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rapid7's PE ratio is 64.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.79x versus 2.14x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.